Running派

赛事一站式服务

Description

微步running派是一款赛事垂直社交软件,为选手提供一对一专属VIP赛事服务,选手也可随时随地发起聊天,打造跑者专属社交圈。同时,提供马拉松、越野赛赛事报名、赛事宣传、赛事设计、服饰、号码簿、奖牌、计时打卡、成绩发布、证书下载、照片回顾等一站式服务。

In-Apps

派币42
¥100.00
派币210
¥700.00
派币350
¥1.20
派币686
¥2.20
派币3626
¥12.00
派币6986
¥22.00

Screenshots

Running派 FAQ

  • Is Running派 free?

    Yes, Running派 is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.

  • Is Running派 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does Running派 cost?

    Running派 has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is ¥139.57.

  • What is Running派 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of Running派 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Japan yet.
Ratings History

Running派 Reviews

腊鸡app

688铁粉 on

China

实名认证电话绑定后根本不同步参赛赛事,人工24小时不在线

生命至上

DISS格格小区 on

China

不好用,还费电,户外使用等同于拿生命开玩笑

好用

千万别吓载,真垃圾 on

China

666

顶尖赛事越野软件

小小..K on

China

定位准确,耗电量低,数据精准,播报准,功能很强大👍继续努力

垃圾软件

凉子诺 on

China

耗电快,动不动就闪退,强制更新

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
197

Running派 Installs

Last 30 days

Running派 Revenue

Last 30 days

Running派 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Running派 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Sports
Languages
English, Arabic, Danish, Dutch, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, Spanish, Turkish, Vietnamese
Recent release
5.0.4 (2 weeks ago )
Released on
Sep 3, 2020 (4 years ago )
Last Updated
1 month ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.