最好水平

Measure the surface precisely

Downloads
Revenue

Description

如果您需要說明是否一個特定的表面均勻,應用的最好水平是專為您服務!
有了這個虛擬儀器,功能相同,因為它是真實的物理當量(又稱libella,水平尺或氣泡級),你可以很容易地檢查,如果測得的表面確實是偶數。不同類型的精神層面的,可以使用的木匠,石匠,瓦工等建築行業的工人,測量師和金屬製造。經典的度量水平旁最好水平還包含校準選項和靶心水平(也稱為圓形氣泡),它可以同時測量水平在兩個維度 - 水平和垂直。如果測得的表面均勻,在屏幕上會顯示球成了紅色。如果表面不平整,球會保持灰色,將位於取景器中央之外。
我們推薦誰欣賞精密工具所有用戶對我們的應用程序的最好水平!

Screenshots

最好水平 FAQ

  • Is 最好水平 free?

    Yes, 最好水平 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 最好水平 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 最好水平 cost?

    最好水平 is free.

  • What is 最好水平 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 最好水平 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Hong Kong SAR China yet.
Ratings History

最好水平 Reviews

No Reviews in Hong Kong SAR China
App doesn't have any reviews in Hong Kong SAR China yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

The Best Level Installs

Last 30 days

The Best Level Revenue

Last 30 days

最好水平 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into The Best Level performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.

App Info

Category
Utilities
Languages
Arabic, Catalan, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek (modern), Hebrew (modern), Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian Bokmål, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Chinese, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Chinese, Turkish, Ukrainian, Vietnamese
Recent release
1.8.0 (3 years ago )
Released on
Nov 3, 2014 (10 years ago )
Last Updated
1 month ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.