时间轴-全球历史

Published by: 子浩 张

Description

跨越万年,从石器时代到21世纪,重大历史事件一一展现在您面前,更有平行时间轴让您更直观的查看全球历史。
游戏玩累了,剧集追完了,找个时间看看我们世界真实的历史,也许您会发现些不一样的东西。

Screenshots

时间轴-全球历史 FAQ

  • Is 时间轴-全球历史 free?

    Yes, 时间轴-全球历史 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 时间轴-全球历史 legit?

    🤔 The 时间轴-全球历史 app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 时间轴-全球历史 cost?

    时间轴-全球历史 is free.

  • What is 时间轴-全球历史 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 时间轴-全球历史 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Austria yet.
Ratings History

时间轴-全球历史 Reviews

类别标签到底怎么打的?

林杰米 on

China

明明发生在中国的事情,一会儿标中国,一会标亚洲,居然还把上海单独标出来了,咋个,上海这是独立出去了吗?

差评

大骨头123 on

China

不能分类搜索,也不能按类别定制时间轴,心疼我的25大洋

不支持ios15

猪猪是最可爱的哇 on

China

不适配

一直想找这样一个软件 不错

才不告诉你! on

China

建议继续丰富内容,再接再厉。

真的无法评论

其实脆弱 on

China

做成这种用户体验也是没谁了

擅自扣费

瞌睡de素颜56 on

China

扣费25

别买

秋秋的秋千 on

China

别买,真挺不好用的,和简介不一样

没反应

据重复吗 on

China

界面是明白的,也注册不了,一直显示已取消,应该是不做这个产品了吧

建议

阿蕾不知道说点啥 on

China

记录上次浏览位置,索引百度百科,特定标签/分类直接筛选而非所有都要搜索

提一下建议

哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈cccc on

China

我感觉作者可以放一下权限,让用户对时间轴进行编辑添加,你们在后台进行审核和修改。这样可以让这个软件内容更加丰富。时间轴是个庞大的工程,就像牛津字典的编写一样,一个人或者团队的力量毕竟有限。加油更好!

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Paid
205
Top Paid
206
Top Paid
208
Top Paid
220
Top Paid
273

时间轴-全球历史 Competitors

Timeline Installs

Last 30 days

Timeline Revenue

Last 30 days

时间轴-全球历史 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Timeline performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.