AI Chat 4.0: Genius

いま西暦何年？って聞くと、2021年と返ってきました。初歩的な部分がまだかなと。

The AI is, in it’s own word, “exclusively positive.” Having an AI unable to engage with the other hemisphere of human emotion and tone isn’t worth the subscription. It’s an interesting parlor trick but fundamentally neutered from being useful.

もうタイトルそのまま 初っ端から課金勧めてくるしとりあえず会話を2、3回ほどしてみたけど その後は質問を送信しようとすると課金を勧められ、そこで終了となる。 質問してから返事がくるまで数秒かかる。その間に前画面に戻ってしまうとせっかくの内容が見れないのも困る 課金はちなみに2500円だった そんだけ金かけるくらいならSiriに頼るかな〜とアンストしました。 星2つは質問にしっかり答えていたのでその分

すばらしいじゃない。これ何でもできそう。素晴らしすぎて、信じられない位。

Very useful

Now I’ve been performing a test on ai language models where I give them five questions, and then give them corrections and more details. This ai scored a 2/5 on this useless test but the daily question limit prevented me from continuing, so I have a recommendation: instead of a daily limit, you would see an ad after the same amount of messages as the daily limit. This would mean that the subscription service could still be profitable, as it would remove ads, and the developers of the app would be making more money from the ads. Honestly, I wouldn’t care as long as I didn’t have to worry about the daily limit ruining the test.

Please review 1. Biblical Foundation for Church Planting. 2. Write full information on the cited books in MLA form.

Very good service

I am new to using AI, so far I am very impressed with how well you can converse with Genius. I recommend trying it for sure.

It gave me a really sense of understanding over what I dreamed the night before, it is really helpful. Thanks