Useless
This app doesn’t help with anything. Completely useless and a waste of money
Ja, Image Finder ist kostenlos herunterzuladen, enthält jedoch In-App-Käufe oder Abonnements.
Nicht genügend Bewertungen, um eine zuverlässige Einschätzung vorzunehmen. Die App benötigt mehr Nutzerfeedback.
Image Finder bietet mehrere In-App-Käufe/Abonnements, der durchschnittliche In-App-Preis beträgt $19.00.
Um geschätzte Einnahmen der Image Finder-App und weitere AppStore-Einblicke zu erhalten, können Sie sich bei der AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform anmelden.
This app doesn’t help with anything. Completely useless and a waste of money
The Yandex and the Baidu versions don’t work anymore (I bought the Yandex upgrade, used to work, now it doesn’t)
Does not work
I d/l and installed this app because it was one of only three on the App Store that will do reverse image lookups using a URL. Sadly it wasn’t specified in the feature description that you must pay (upgrade to the Pro version) to use this feature. I would categorize this as deceptive marketing and therefore I opted not to choose this app for my reverse image lookup needs.
This isn't the app I'd suggest to search for a photograph of something that's not online. I've tried it with a few different searches and it's found some-mostly unambiguous ones. The main issue is where it goes; not to an ordinary browser. In fact, I don't know where they go unless it's to a faux browser within the app. For me that makes the results essentially useless. I've a link but it's unworkable except when I copy them into Chrome-That's annoying to do when you find something. The quality of the found Images is really low, like they display everything with 1994 photo resolution just because they can. Of course I use Google images for anything I find online; this type of reverse image search is useful for my own photos. Reversee is finally good enough to be reasonably reliable so I tend to use that as my first choice. I may see if anything else is worth having handy but last I checked nothing was, certainly not this.