VIP Access for iPhone

Using a digital ID from a security token has 30 seconds valid time, but using VIP Access app has only valid when the app is still running in foreground mode, once I switched to another app to use the ID I memorized, it became invalid. This make this kind of use cases I need to use the digital ID in other apps invalid. So I still need to bring another token key. Hope this can be improved!

I like this app and I have been using it for many years. However, as other similar apps have already done, it really needs touch/face ID in order to prevent unauthorized persons from getting the code if the phone is compromised.

Sends me a code that’s always invalid absolute junk

Tap and hold not intuitive & should be a single click.

Several times I have accidentally swiped the wrong direction and have deleted my authenticator for a website. The app doesn’t ask to confirm the deletion, which causes major headaches with getting user accounts re authenticated with websites.

Never works. Zero stars. Waste of my time. And no support to assist.

This app does not support Face ID, Touch ID, or a passcode. If a thief grabs your unlocked phone from your hand and runs off, he can access your financial accounts and steal your money. It would be a simple change to require Face ID to open the app. Please, Broadcom, fix this.

This app is supposed to be used for several of my financial institutions. The problem is that the key and seed for the app are generated per DEVICE instead of per service. This is absolutely mind boggling and insecure. What is the purpose of having a security key duplicated across different services? Any institution using this as 2FA should be embarrassed and switch to standard TOTP

Is this a cruel joke? How is it this app has No secure login. > No Face ID. > No password Nothing. It’s actually MORE SECURE to not to use this if the app that requires it has Face ID built-in. What an absolute joke!

My other authenticator apps all have Face ID enabled. It's a huge added security feature. Therefore, I believe Symantec needs to add this as well!