Waste of time
Nice idea, but nothing worth buying a subscription to . And worse yet this doesn’t work.
Да, Count Things Object Counter можно скачать бесплатно, однако в приложении есть встроенные покупки или подписки.
⚠️ Приложение Count Things Object Counter имеет низкие оценки и отрицательные отзывы. Пользователи, похоже, недовольны его качеством или функциями.
Count Things Object Counter имеет несколько покупок/подписок внутри приложения, средняя цена покупки составляет CHF 18.83.
Чтобы получить оценку дохода приложения Count Things Object Counter и другие данные AppStore, вы можете зарегистрироваться на платформе мобильной аналитики AppTail.
Nice idea, but nothing worth buying a subscription to . And worse yet this doesn’t work.
Did not work at all. Was able to count nothing.
You have to get the paid version for it to work, you have like five counts total then they make you pay. And even with the five free ones it is not accurate
This is priced the best out of the 3 I’ve found but I’m not trying to pay $5 just to see if it works as well as the other 2 when I could just get one free attempt and if it worked I’d happily do a year
Unable to get this app to work at all. Dev is using a google site and gmail for support/ToS which may not be the best indicator of things. Also, can't get a refund so $40 for literally zero use. Geesh. Read the fine print though.
Tried the free version. Tried to use on my bookcases, wide varied of colors. Tested it on the whole case and one shelf. Both performed poorly. For this: you have to ID an object (apparently the paid version does this automatically). But, based on the poor (nonexistent) performance it had, I just deleted the app.
App doesn’t count. You have to manually touch each object in the photo. Also wrong, is the photo is not fully displayed. False advertising and application uses.
I tried a test count and it wouldn’t recognize anything. Then it kept prompting me to buy a subscription. So you can’t even test to see if it work’s accurately. I won’t pay to test.
Expensive and honestly was faster to count by hand.
Tried it with a photograph of books on the shelf (seven). It did not work. Tried it again with a photograph of hat on a wall (six). Did not work again. Perhaps this is one of those that requires the subscription just to be able to do a simple count, but it was not clear.
Рейтинг
|
Категория
|
Позиция
|
---|---|---|
Топ бесплатных
|
|
494
|