Eko: Digital Stethoscope + ECG

Something’s wrong with English language. Spanish is OK.

Both the stethoscope that works with this app and the app itself are trash. I returned the stethoscope and have tried to get my money back for the app that is now useless to me and they refuse to refund it.

I purchased one basically because I have bad hearing. I love it. I’m the only nurse that has the Eko 500. There is another nurse that uses the smaller device because of hearing issues. I shared my stethoscope with a nurse practitioner the other day and she returned it to me that afternoon with compliments. I told her it is even better when you can use the app with it. There is another nurse practitioner that I work with that has been wanting one but wasn’t sure if it was worth it. She was able to try mine out and she loves it. I have probably sold two of these just by letting some nurses try it out. Thank you for helping those of us that can’t hear well. It is a great advancement. I understand LSU uses these also ! Kudos!!!!

I initially purchased the Eko Core 500 due to its appealing functionality and innovative features, particularly the murmur detection tool, which was a game-changer for clinical practice. It worked seamlessly and added immense value to my diagnostic process. However, my experience has taken a sharp turn for the worse. After a recent app update, the murmur detection feature was removed, and now it is locked behind a subscription paywall. This abrupt shift is incredibly disappointing. A feature that was integral to the device’s appeal should not be stripped away after purchase. It feels like a bait-and-switch tactic, undermining the trust customers place in the product and brand. What’s worse is that the core functionality of the device is now handicapped unless you commit to ongoing subscription fees. For a premium product like this, essential features should remain accessible without recurring costs after the initial investment. I can no longer recommend the Eko Core 500 to colleagues or anyone considering it. While the hardware itself remains functional, the reliance on the app and its sudden monetization of critical features has severely impacted its value. Unless Eko revisits this decision and restores key functionalities without requiring a subscription, potential buyers should be cautious. This is not the reliable, user-centric device it once was.

Hi why we cant buy EKO+ outside usa???

Very helpful In my medical practice! But with the new app update I’m not able to record all the heart points! I own the 3m digital, yet with the older app version I used to record all points with ease…! What could be the problem?

How do you decided to remove functionality of the app you advertised us to buy the product? This is very wrong and should be part of class action

I bought my EKO Core 500 because of the sharing features, AI detection and more. Now just 2 months after the purchase EKO has decided to remove the features I paid for and downgraded the basic app to basically useless. I will not be paying for EKO+, I want the features I paid for.

I loved Eko before this latest update and let all of my colleagues know. I bragged about how great the EKO 500 was. Now with the new app update, they are charging a paid membership for services that have been included in the app complimentary for years. So I paid $400+ for this stethoscope, and now have to pay $112 a year to use the app functions they TOOK AWAY and are now making us pay for. It’s just absolutely greedy, slimey, and stingy. Absolutely not going to recommend to anyone anymore. So disappointed.

So you pay over 300 USD for a stethoscope that doesn’t really work that well for sound amplification or ambient noise suppression, but you remove features from the accompanying app that allow one to save the audio? Then add murmur detection and A-fib recognition, which are two of the easiest things to hear on cardiac auscultation for 112 USD per year?!! That’s a lot of money for rather useless features. No one who practices medicine is going to rely on those features without a 12 lead ekg and more professional testing (e.g., echo). It’s a novelty at best. And while we’re on the topic of novelty, how appropriate is it to remove the simple record and save feature? Someone might want to record their animal’s heart sounds, or a family member, and pass them around. For whatever reason, removing the recording ability seems pretty tacky.