Charming — doesn’t deserve it’s harsh rating
Okay, so this is definitely underrated. You could see that the developer and artists care about their characters and this project. Put Neopets and Point-and-Click-Games into a blender and you get this. This should be rated higher, and it’s a good game that undeservingly got buried. A couple suggestions, though. I only played the free parts, so they may be invalid for paid viewers. Suggestion 1 - Creature lore? I want creature lore. Give me creature lore. Don’t force me into clicking evidence and there’s cool creatures I don’t know anything about! I want to know more than a short description! Show off your creatures as a compelling hook. It’s what sets you apart from other games! I want to know more about the creatures, because I need a Pokémon Mystery. (This also applies to the characters, I got immediate Apollo vibes as soon as I saw Polgar. Tell me more about your characters!) Suggestion 2 - Warn a F2P before downloading a game that’s basically a demo. I get the Devs worked hard on the game, but…I can’t afford it. *Sad noises* There’s only one chapter available for someone that’s F2P. I know the rest of the game’s good because of the book series reference, so it hurts. Guess I got to keep trekking on the F2P route with rhythm games and Mihoyo. (…Seriously, about half of my phone is rhythm games at this point, it’s ridiculous.) In summary: Good game, give me creature lore
