Good but has some mistakes and issues
First of all it's great since there's nothing else for Hieroglyphics in an app version. However, for using as a dictionary it has several issues. - the Dickson dictionary is a good source, but it's not comprehensive. Adding entries from Faulkner and Rosette project would be great. - the MdC was confused with Gardiners code - would be great if the vocabulary is listed according to Gardiner order - search per Gardiner code(beginning with; containing) is very very useful in my experiences of consulting a dictionary for new hieroglyphics - there are many variations of one vacabulary, adding variations forms and their origins (listed in Faulkner dictionary) would be a dream Over all, i wouldn't rely on it for Hieroglyphics lookups but it is quite good with great improvement room.