Under appreciated
I cannot day enough about how important this app and its original book are to the study of Logic.
ReasonLines
Разработчик:
Wallace Murphree
Описание
ReasonLines provides (1) a new and easier approach to the traditional syllogism and (2) an expansion of the traditional syllogism to include numerical quantification.
1)The new approach to the traditional syllogism
Instead of considering isolated statements as the components of arguments, such as major premise, minor premise, and conclusion, this new approach bundles each statement with its equivalents and each bundle is represented by its own “schematic” of arrows. The premise schematics can then be dropped in place along side each other where their juxtaposition displays whatever conclusion, if any, is entailed. The user only needs to learn how to select the correct premise schematics and how to follow the arrows for a conclusion.
Part One of the Help page is a tutorial for this new approach.
(2)The numerical expansion of the traditional syllogism
It is already standard to interpret the particular quantifier numerically; that is, it is standard to take “some” as “at least one.” Moreover, the universal quantifiers, “all” and “no,” can also be faithfully rendered numerically since “all” means “all with zero exception” and “no” means none “none with zero exception.” Given this, it turns out that the traditional quantifiers simply mark the beginnings of endless possible quantifications since “at least one” opens the series of “at least two,” “at least three,” etc., and “all (none) but zero” opens “all (none) but one,” “all (none) but two,” etc.
By making this explicit, the zero and one of traditional syllogisms become replaceable by other numbers. So, for example, “All but 10 A are B and all but 20 B are C, so All but 30 A are C,” and “At least 100 A are B, All but 7 B are C, so At least 93 A are C,” are just as valid as the traditional Barbara and Darii, and for the very same reason.
Part Two of the Help page develops this numerical expansion by appealing to the schematics.
Скрыть
Показать больше...
1)The new approach to the traditional syllogism
Instead of considering isolated statements as the components of arguments, such as major premise, minor premise, and conclusion, this new approach bundles each statement with its equivalents and each bundle is represented by its own “schematic” of arrows. The premise schematics can then be dropped in place along side each other where their juxtaposition displays whatever conclusion, if any, is entailed. The user only needs to learn how to select the correct premise schematics and how to follow the arrows for a conclusion.
Part One of the Help page is a tutorial for this new approach.
(2)The numerical expansion of the traditional syllogism
It is already standard to interpret the particular quantifier numerically; that is, it is standard to take “some” as “at least one.” Moreover, the universal quantifiers, “all” and “no,” can also be faithfully rendered numerically since “all” means “all with zero exception” and “no” means none “none with zero exception.” Given this, it turns out that the traditional quantifiers simply mark the beginnings of endless possible quantifications since “at least one” opens the series of “at least two,” “at least three,” etc., and “all (none) but zero” opens “all (none) but one,” “all (none) but two,” etc.
By making this explicit, the zero and one of traditional syllogisms become replaceable by other numbers. So, for example, “All but 10 A are B and all but 20 B are C, so All but 30 A are C,” and “At least 100 A are B, All but 7 B are C, so At least 93 A are C,” are just as valid as the traditional Barbara and Darii, and for the very same reason.
Part Two of the Help page develops this numerical expansion by appealing to the schematics.
Скриншоты
ReasonLines Частые Вопросы
-
Приложение ReasonLines бесплатное?
ReasonLines не является бесплатным (стоимость составляет 0.99), однако оно не содержит встроенных покупок или подписок.
-
Является ли ReasonLines фейковым или мошенническим?
Недостаточно отзывов для надежной оценки. Приложению нужно больше отзывов пользователей.
Спасибо за ваш голос -
Сколько стоит ReasonLines?
Цена ReasonLines составляет 0.99.
-
Сколько зарабатывает ReasonLines?
Чтобы получить оценку дохода приложения ReasonLines и другие данные AppStore, вы можете зарегистрироваться на платформе мобильной аналитики AppTail.
Оценки пользователей
Приложение еще не оценено в Испания.
История оценок
ReasonLines Отзывы Пользователей
Оценки
История позиций в топах
История рейтингов пока не доступна
Позиции в категории
Приложение еще не было в топах
ReasonLines Установки
30дн.
ReasonLines Доход
30дн.ReasonLines Доходы и Загрузки
Получите ценные инсайты о производительности ReasonLines с помощью нашей аналитики.
Зарегистрируйтесь сейчас, чтобы получить доступ к статистика загрузок и доходов и многому другому.
Зарегистрируйтесь сейчас, чтобы получить доступ к статистика загрузок и доходов и многому другому.
Информация о приложении
- Категория
- Education
- Разработчик
- Wallace Murphree
- Языки
- English
- Последнее обновление
- 1.3 (9 месяцев назад )
- Выпущено
- Jan 6, 2017 (7 лет назад )
- Также доступно в
- Соединенные Штаты , Россия , Новая Зеландия , Израиль , Индия , Италия , Япония , Республика Корея , Кувейт , Казахстан , Ливан , Мексика , Малайзия , Нигерия , Нидерланды , Норвегия , Ирландия , Перу , Филиппины , Пакистан , Польша , Румыния , Швеция , Сингапур , Таиланд , Украина , Вьетнам , Южно-Африканская Республика , Дания , Австрия , Австралия , Азербайджан , Бельгия , Бразилия , Беларусь , Канада , Швейцария , Чили , Китай , Колумбия , Чехия , Германия , ОАЭ , Доминиканская Республика , Алжир , Эквадор , Египет , Испания , Финляндия , Франция , Великобритания , Греция , Гонконг (САР) , Венгрия , Индонезия
- Обновлено
- 1 месяц назад
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.
AppTail.