UWorld Nursing

Разработчик: UWorld
Скачивания
Доход

Описание

N/A

Встроенные покупки

NCLEX-PN 30 days with NGN
2,490.00 r
NCLEX-PN 60 days with NGN
2,990.00 r
NCLEX-PN 90 days with NGN
3,990.00 r
NCLEX-RN 30 days with NGN
2,990.00 r
NCLEX-RN 60 days with NGN
3,990.00 r
NCLEX-RN 90 days with NGN
4,990.00 r
NCLEX-PN 360 days with NGN
4,990.00 r
NCLEX-PN 730 days with NGN
5,990.00 r
NCLEX-RN 360 days with NGN
7,990.00 r
NCLEX-RN 730 days with NGN
8,990.00 r

Скриншоты

UWorld Nursing Частые Вопросы

  • Приложение UWorld Nursing бесплатное?

    Да, UWorld Nursing можно скачать бесплатно, однако в приложении есть встроенные покупки или подписки.

  • Является ли UWorld Nursing фейковым или мошенническим?

    🤔 Качество приложения UWorld Nursing спорное. Некоторые пользователи довольны, в то время как другие сообщают о проблемах. Рекомендуем ознакомиться с отдельными отзывами для получения более полной картины.

    Спасибо за ваш голос

  • Сколько стоит UWorld Nursing?

    UWorld Nursing имеет несколько покупок/подписок внутри приложения, средняя цена покупки составляет 4,940.00 r.

  • Сколько зарабатывает UWorld Nursing?

    Чтобы получить оценку дохода приложения UWorld Nursing и другие данные AppStore, вы можете зарегистрироваться на платформе мобильной аналитики AppTail.

Оценки пользователей
Приложение еще не оценено в Норвегия.
История оценок

UWorld Nursing Отзывы Пользователей

Great questions, terrible UI/UX

Jdawg8867 on

Соединенные Штаты

The questions are great compared to what other apps offer, especially the next gen ones. However for the price, it’s not worth it. The mobile app interface is horrendous and antiquated. The filter functionality is severely lacking and it’s not possible to customize the exams in the way I need them to be filtered. Although, many of the apps have that issue, so that’s not a unique problem to their app (unfortunately). To give an example of one that excels in this area, the Lecturio app has the best filtering functions I have found; however, even that is not perfect. UWorld is hardly trying. Btw, how is filtering by “basic care and comfort” helpful? Those are just arbitrary categories and useless buzz words imo. They’re not actually useful categories to filter by as a nursing student though (and by not useful I mean 100% useless). Most of those categories like “physiological adaptation” and “infection and safety control” are always applicable, from the first class to the last. We don’t actually get tested on those subjects individually, so it’s worthless. Filtering that way creates exams that have questions that are way past what we’ve learned or way beyond it. It’s the equivalent of a junk drawer. “How about filtering by patho type (pancreatic, liver, neural, etc) or pharm type (antidiabetics, analgesics, etc) and then combining any which way you want. Also being able to save those parameters for future quiz creation. I don’t think any app has that, sadly. Makes me want to build my own. As an aside, I was a developer in my last career, so I am analyzing this app from a programmer’s mindset as well, not just a nursing student standpoint. Anyway back to the problems with their app. The max questions per quiz is 85 which is cheap of them. My guess is that they limit data storage or connectivity. Assuming they’re part of a fiber network, that would mean they just aren’t buying enough storage on whatever servers they’re renting from whatever data center they’re partnered with. That’s so cheap and lazy, especially taking the price into consideration. They have ample money to cover the costs of more uptime/downtime and/or data storage and still maintain a great profitability margin. An app that isn’t being cheap would be the Mastery NCLEX app, which has no limit on quiz questions. I’d recommend doing what it takes to remove the limit. Speaking of the Mastery app, their UI/UX is nearly flawless and responds at lightning speed. UWorld could learn a thing or two from

Great App for passing NCLEX

م ل ي ك ا on

Соединенные Штаты

This app is the best. I only used it for 2 months but every day. And I passed NCLEX-RN in the first attempt. Thank you UWORLD!

4 Stars because I was never able to use the iPhone app as it

ISABELLri on

Соединенные Штаты

4 Stars because I was never able to use the iPhone app as the “login” buttons never worked. I used the website to use the question bank. I finished about 52% of all the UWorld questions (including nextGen style questions) I averaged a 76% overall. I took the NCLEX this passed Monday the first time and passed. I study for 1 month everyday studying between 50-100 question and reading every rational with every question and every video that was attached to the rationale. You can do this!

Study Plan

FRLL19 on

Соединенные Штаты

I’ve really enjoyed the study plan you can generate in preparation. It takes the load of guessing where to start and how to progress. **Wish there was a captions option for the lecture videos.

Very unstable app

DeltaTheCreature on

Соединенные Штаты

Loves the rational but the App always freeze and show the error message . Worse with pro max 13 I used to delete and download the app more than 10 times a day and I never experienced this problem with archer even I pay less.

Not wroth the advice given to use this

Gimmesomeluv on

Соединенные Штаты

Still failed NCLEX

BUY IT FROM THE WEBSITE

Serenkay on

Соединенные Штаты

The prices are different from buying from the AppStore or from the website. App Store is twice as much versus the website and you get better options

Bad for mobile

JEMS_101 on

Соединенные Штаты

This app is terrible for use on your phone.

Archer is Better

beasaptang on

Соединенные Штаты

I used Uworld multiple times and failed each time. Way too expensive while Archer is cheaper, provides multiple assessment tests instead of just 1-2 like Uworld, and I ended up passing with Archer. I gave Uworld multiple chances but it just didn’t work out. On top of that, Archer gives money back guarantee if you fail using their system. Uworld has not done anything to ensure I pass even though I’ve failed using their system multiple times. I wish I used Archer sooner. The Uworld app was convenient though. However, Archer provides the same thing and more!

Annoying

JKL5689754578 on

Соединенные Штаты

The questions, rationales, and explanations are great. I love the graphics involved. BUTTT I’m trying to study for the NCLEX and half the time I get a error message in the app and here recently the calculator stopped working correctly. Spent $189 on something that I can barely use 🙄

Оценки

История позиций в топах
История рейтингов пока не доступна
Позиции в категории
Рейтинг
Категория
Позиция
Топ бесплатных
268
Топ бесплатных
332
Топ бесплатных
341
Топ бесплатных
461

Ключевые слова

UWorld Nursing Конкуренты

Name
Nursing School & NCLEX Prep
Exam Prep with SimpleNursing
Archer Review NCLEX
Ace the NCLEX on the GO!
Picmonic Nursing School Study
ATI LPN FNP NCLEX RN Questions
Elsevier eBooks on VitalSource
Pocket Prep Nursing School
Pass ATI TEAS, HESI A2, NCLEX
Lecturio Nursing | NCLEX Prep
Pass NCLEX & Nursing School
Nursing Exams Mobile Prep 2024
Review & Mastery for Nurses
NCLEX RN Exam Prep
1000+ Practice Test Questions
Pocket Prep Nursing
Pass PMHNP, CCRN, CEN, CNOR
Kaplan Medical
USMLE & COMLEX Prep

UWorld Nursing Установки

30дн.

UWorld Nursing Доход

30дн.

UWorld Nursing Доходы и Загрузки

Получите ценные инсайты о производительности UWorld Nursing с помощью нашей аналитики.
Зарегистрируйтесь сейчас, чтобы получить доступ к статистика загрузок и доходов и многому другому.

Информация о приложении

Категория
Education
Разработчик
UWorld
Языки
English
Последнее обновление
11.1.1 (1 неделю назад )
Выпущено
Apr 6, 2015 (9 лет назад )
Обновлено
1 неделю назад
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.