文言文字典-简单易用的古文言文翻译词典

诗词文言文翻译学习好帮手

Published by: 小龙 胡
Downloads
Revenue

Description

该字典紧扣初中高中大学文言文科目内容,是您学习文言文的必备利器,同时还有文言文的阅读内容,对于中国传统文化的爱好者,也不失为一个好用工具
汉语,即汉民族共同语,又称中文、汉文,其他名称有国文、国语、华文、华语、唐文、中国语,还有唐话、中国话等俗称。汉语属于汉藏语系分析语,有声调。汉语的文字系统汉字是一种意音文字,表意的同时也具一定的表音功能。汉语包含书面语以及口语两部分。古代书面汉语称为文言文,现代书面汉语一般指现代标准汉语。现代汉语方言众多,某些方言的口语之间差异较大,而书面语相对统一。在“五四”时期白话文运动以前,书面语和口语的区别实际上是古语与今语的区别。以唐宋时代为例,当时人口里说的是白话,笔下写的是文言,即以先秦诸子和《左传》、《史记》等广泛传诵的名篇为范本的古文文体(其中古诗词是中文独有的一种文体)。这种情形往上大概可以推到两汉时期。往下一直延续到20世纪初叶。孙中山1925年立的遗嘱就是用文言写的。不过2000年来作为书面语的文言本身也在变化。仿古终归难以乱真,后世人模仿古语不可能不受当时口语的影响。随着互联网时代的到来,无论是在线汉语词典,还是汉语词典软件、汉语字典软件,都对宏扬汉语语言文化,发挥了应有的作用。
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

文言文字典 FAQ

  • Is 文言文字典 free?

    Yes, 文言文字典 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 文言文字典 legit?

    Not enough reviews to make a reliable assessment. The app needs more user feedback.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 文言文字典 cost?

    文言文字典 is free.

  • What is 文言文字典 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 文言文字典 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating
App is not rated in Norway yet.
Ratings History

文言文字典 Reviews

No Reviews in Norway
App doesn't have any reviews in Norway yet.

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
Chart
Category
Rank
Top Free
209
Top Free
327

Keywords

文言文字典 Competitors

Name
汉语字典和汉语成语词典-主持人配音
包含10个最常用的汉语工具
古代汉语词典-词语辨析/语法与虚词/古籍解字词
古诗文网
古诗词文言文大全
古诗词典-不一样的诗词
古文岛
古诗文网通用版
文言文翻译官-诗词古文观止转换翻译器
白话文言文翻译平台
诗词之美
现代汉语词典-一部久享盛誉的规范型词典
承载大国文化,记录文明脚步
古汉语字典大全
文言文 - 古文解析

文言文字典 Installs

Last 30 days

文言文字典 Revenue

Last 30 days

文言文字典 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into 文言文字典 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.