Articles +

I get that developers need to make money, but they seem to fail to understand that us consumers can't simply get a subscription for each and every single app or service out there. If we did we would end up with hundres of € of service each month. I'd more than happily pay something like € 5-10 once but not € 3 a month for just a read later service. Heck, Pocket and Instapaper can be used without limits, only certain features cost money, not above a certain amount of articles. It also make's it so that I can't just switch from Pocket to Articles by importing or copy-pasting my articles, since there's a limit of 30 a month.

WORKS GREAT AND VERY HANDY.

This app is incredibly easy to use, and is incredibly useful—everything can be sorted into groups (tags), and can be easily annotated.

I mainly use Safari on macOS, the reason why I don't choose Chrome is because Safari can save the web page as "Web archive" format, this format retains the original format of the web page, but there is an inconvenience in this manual saving is that there is no effective information organization; I wonder if the author can implement such a saving option on Articles .

Impressive! Best capture and organizing of web content for research projects! Every article I clipped was accurate. I highly recommend you give this a try. I've used Safari Extensions for Notes, Evernote, Bear and Safari's 'Export to Pdf' for capturing and organizing content for offline reading -- they have no where near the capture accuracy and article organization features. Along with the article, this saves the website link and provides a reader. Haven't tried the Tags yet, but looks like you can optionally use your own tagging system. More features yet to explore - this is a keeper for me.

On the VERY FIRST article I tried to save, an all text article, this app missed critical information (the first paragraph) vs. the web view. I really want to like this program, but other services do far better - Reeder, Pocket and Instapaper come to mind. That I can see the web view in app to make sure things aren't missing and lack of any kind of settings panel is a deal breaker. It's of no use if I constantly have to check to make sure I didn't miss any information.

Provides the basics for a read-it-later application: Nice design, tagging, syncs to iphone/iPad. And I *really* like the way Articles lets you highlight text, write annotations, and then cleanly export your highlights and annotations. That's essential to how I work. My problem is that I get too many failures to save articles. If Articles can't download a page, it should at least save that page as a bookmark, so at least I have *something.* This one problem may cause me to abandon the app, or maybe use something else for read-it-later and use Articles only for highlights and annotations.

Sticks to the basics where more popular apps fail. Read, annotate, favorite, tag, archive, search, on iOS or desktop. Review annotations for any article in a convenient format. A few minor bugs but the developer is active and responsive. This is the best article reading software available for Apple devices.

The only thing that holds me from giving another start is that there’s no integration with Mac... THIS IS TOO PERFECT FOR NOT TO HAVE SOMETHING TO CONNECT WITH MAC. On the other hand... it’s less complicated than Pocket or Instapaper, but powerful enough for what we all need: some place to save better, read better and use better. Awesome app! (Just needs a Mac integration or, even better, an app for Mac)

I select text and then menu to highlight does not appear (iPhone XS Max)