五子棋-雙人對戰版

精品休閑遊戲推薦

Published by: 欢 饶

Description

五子棋是壹種兩人對弈的純策略型棋類遊戲,通常雙方分別使用黑白兩色的棋子,下在棋盤直線與橫線的交叉點上,先形成5子連線者獲勝。
五子棋棋具與圍棋通用,起源於中國上古時代的傳統黑白棋種之壹。主要流行於華人和漢字文化圈的國家以及歐美壹些地區,是世界上最古老的棋。
五子棋容易上手,老少皆宜,而且趣味橫生,引人入勝;不僅能增強思維能力,提高智力,而且富含哲理,有助於修身養性。
五子棋,日文亦有“連五子、五子連、串珠、五目、五目碰、五格、五石、五法、五聯、京棋”等多種稱謂,英文則稱為“FIR (Five In A Row的縮寫), Gomoku, Gobang, connect 5, mo-rphion. 捷克語piskvorky,韓語omok
Hide Show More...

Screenshots

五子棋-雙人對戰版 FAQ

  • Is 五子棋-雙人對戰版 free?

    Yes, 五子棋-雙人對戰版 is completely free and it doesn't have any in-app purchases or subscriptions.

  • Is 五子棋-雙人對戰版 legit?

    ‼️️ The 五子棋-雙人對戰版 app seems suspicious. Many reviews appear fake or manipulated. Exercise caution.

    Thanks for the vote

  • How much does 五子棋-雙人對戰版 cost?

    五子棋-雙人對戰版 is free.

  • What is 五子棋-雙人對戰版 revenue?

    To get estimated revenue of 五子棋-雙人對戰版 app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.

User Rating

4.33 out of 5

3 ratings in Taiwan

5 star
1
4 star
2
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Ratings History

五子棋-雙人對戰版 Reviews

好难

dajdd on

China

0

好好玩,就是广告太多了。

恶魔之姜 on

China

这一个五子棋非常的好玩,建议大家去玩。就是广告太多了,希望设计师能把这一个缺点改进一下。

NRD209 on

China

太差了

emmm

卡片行者 on

China

开始玩一局,叫我录。录不了,应该怎么录呢?

太难了

嘉年华小汐 on

China

太难了

五子棋

g g jhhhh on

China

广告太多了

广告多,太难了

yyr5864 on

China

那人机也太难了,刚玩完一局就来了个拼夕夕

🐔

毁心。 on

China

人🐔太难了……

黑子怎么是黑色的?

PatrickZ84 on

China

为什么白子是白色?黑子是黑色质量问题做得这么差

哈尔滨

孔设计符合淡化的办吧百度百度吧百度百度荷花淡化的吧百度吧 on

China

Store Rankings

Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
App is not ranked yet

Keywords

Gomoku Installs

Last 30 days

Gomoku Revenue

Last 30 days

五子棋-雙人對戰版 Revenue and Downloads

Gain valuable insights into Gomoku performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.