Meitu
Your app is amazing!I love the quality and everything!The only thing i dont like is that i can do only 1 video on a day!And i need to pay to make more than 1 video!Also can you make wink avaliable for more countries?I will appreciate it!❤️
Description
The Performance Stat Index (PSI) was first introduced in 2009 in the form of a workbook for players on the ATP Challenger circuit to make them aware of strengths and weaknesses as well as get an overall view of their performance. Two more indexes were later added to the PSI for players in the intermediate and more advanced player range right below the highest level Index used on the ATP Challenger circuit.
Index 1: players with UTRs 3-6.99
Index 2: players with UTRs 7-10.99
Index 3: players with UTRs 11+
A statistical algorithm adds up the total RATIO DIFFERENCE of WON (Good Shots) to LOST (Bad Shots) points in a set. The algorithm then calculates to find the AVERAGE of points either won or lost PER GAME in the set. We refer to these average numbers of points as PSI Ratings.
Good Shots = Unreturned Serves, Winners, Forced Errors
Bad Shots = Double Faults, Unforced Errors, Missed Makeable Shots
After a set is played, both players receive PSI Ratings. If the player’s final PSI Ratings are positive, it means they won more points than lost. If the player’s final PSI Ratings are negative, it means they lost more points than won.
At the core of the app are the three indexes that ultimately bestow the PSI GRADES. Three areas of a player’s performance are graded within each designated Index; SERVICE PERFORMANCE, GROUNDSTROKE AND AUXILIARY, and OVERALL PERFORMANCE. All areas consist of uniformed parameters of Good Shot/Bad Shot point averages that make up each Index established through years of research of charting competitive matches at all levels of the game.
The following are the PSI PERFORMANCE GRADES.
Excellent Performance
Above Average Performance
Solid Performance
Below Average Performance
Poor Performance
Because the total number of shots recorded can fluctuate, ratios can vary from a 1 to 1.1 ratio to a 1 to 1.9 ratio and so on. A point of reference (midpoint) and closest to Index 2 OVERALL PERFORMANCE parameters is this example.
Excellent Performance
3 Good Shots to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Above Average Performance
2 Good Shots to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Solid Performance
1 Good Shot to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Below Average Performance
1 Good Shot to 2 Bad Shot Ratio
Poor Performance
1 Good Shot to 3 Bad Shot Ratio
Index 1 will have a lower threshold to Solid. Index 3 will have a higher threshold to Solid.
Terms of Use EULA: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
Hide
Show More...
Index 1: players with UTRs 3-6.99
Index 2: players with UTRs 7-10.99
Index 3: players with UTRs 11+
A statistical algorithm adds up the total RATIO DIFFERENCE of WON (Good Shots) to LOST (Bad Shots) points in a set. The algorithm then calculates to find the AVERAGE of points either won or lost PER GAME in the set. We refer to these average numbers of points as PSI Ratings.
Good Shots = Unreturned Serves, Winners, Forced Errors
Bad Shots = Double Faults, Unforced Errors, Missed Makeable Shots
After a set is played, both players receive PSI Ratings. If the player’s final PSI Ratings are positive, it means they won more points than lost. If the player’s final PSI Ratings are negative, it means they lost more points than won.
At the core of the app are the three indexes that ultimately bestow the PSI GRADES. Three areas of a player’s performance are graded within each designated Index; SERVICE PERFORMANCE, GROUNDSTROKE AND AUXILIARY, and OVERALL PERFORMANCE. All areas consist of uniformed parameters of Good Shot/Bad Shot point averages that make up each Index established through years of research of charting competitive matches at all levels of the game.
The following are the PSI PERFORMANCE GRADES.
Excellent Performance
Above Average Performance
Solid Performance
Below Average Performance
Poor Performance
Because the total number of shots recorded can fluctuate, ratios can vary from a 1 to 1.1 ratio to a 1 to 1.9 ratio and so on. A point of reference (midpoint) and closest to Index 2 OVERALL PERFORMANCE parameters is this example.
Excellent Performance
3 Good Shots to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Above Average Performance
2 Good Shots to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Solid Performance
1 Good Shot to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Below Average Performance
1 Good Shot to 2 Bad Shot Ratio
Poor Performance
1 Good Shot to 3 Bad Shot Ratio
Index 1 will have a lower threshold to Solid. Index 3 will have a higher threshold to Solid.
Terms of Use EULA: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
In-Apps
- Monthly Auto-renew VIP
- 17.99 лв.
- Yearly Auto-renew VIP
- 49.99 лв.
- Yearly Auto-renew Meitu VIP+
- 129.99 лв.
- Monthly Auto-renew Meitu VIP+
- 19.99 лв.
- Quarterly Auto-renew VIP
- 19.99 лв.
- AI Portraits
- 6.99 лв.
- 美图AI写真
- 6.99 лв.
Screenshots
Texting App FAQ
-
Is Texting App free?
Yes, Texting App is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.
-
Is Texting App legit?
🤔 The Texting App app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.
Thanks for the vote -
How much does Texting App cost?
Texting App has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 35.99 лв..
-
What is Texting App revenue?
To get estimated revenue of Texting App app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
User Rating
4.88 out of 5
124 ratings in Bulgaria
5 star
117
4 star
3
3 star
1
2 star
2
1 star
1
Ratings History
Texting App Reviews
meitu
I love it! It makes my videos and photos with an amazing quality!!
:(
I can’t use the effects/filters/stickers for videos Also the cutout feature isn’t working for months This is my favourite app but I can’t use it PLEASE DO FIX THE PROBLEMS
Help
Hello! I can’t download any of the filters😤. Please do something I really love the app.
Nice
Lovely app,everything is just perfect❤️
谢谢
谢谢你的大作，给我的生活带来乐趣。
不给退款
我不小心开通了会员 里面要会员的那些我都没有用 然后我申请退款结果不给我退 哇 居然还有这样子的 这个软件
闪退
用着好好的突然闪退打也打不开
还不错
老顾客
进不去
从昨天开始一直闪退
Store Rankings
Ranking History
App Ranking History not available yet
Category Rankings
|
Chart
|
Category
|
Rank
|
|---|---|---|
|
Top Free
|
|
1
|
|
Top Free
|
|
1
|
|
Top Free
|
|
2
|
|
Top Free
|
|
2
|
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|
Keywords
Texting App Competitors
美图秀秀 Installs
Last 30 days
美图秀秀 Revenue
Last 30 daysTexting App Revenue and Downloads
Gain valuable insights into 美图秀秀 performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
App Info
- Category
- Photo Video
- Publisher
-
Xiamen Meitu Technology Co
- Languages
- English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, Spanish, Thai, Tibetan, Chinese, Turkish, Vietnamese
- Recent release
- 11.12.0 (1 week ago )
- Released on
- Jul 10, 2011 (13 years ago )
- Also available in
- China, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Hong Kong SAR China, United States, South Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Canada, Brazil, Indonesia, Australia, Russia, Mexico, United Kingdom, Türkiye, France, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, Germany, Spain, Italy, Ukraine, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Colombia, Netherlands, United Arab Emirates, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Pakistan, Ecuador, Sweden, Switzerland, Poland, South Africa, Israel, Portugal, Belgium, Belarus, Dominican Republic, Azerbaijan, Ireland, Norway, Armenia, Austria, Romania, Denmark, Nigeria, Kuwait, Nepal, Finland, Hungary, Qatar, Uzbekistan, Algeria, Greece, Czechia, Tunisia, Bahrain, Sri Lanka, Lebanon, Ghana, Bulgaria, Croatia, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, Estonia, North Macedonia, Brunei, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Uganda, Slovenia, Malta, Iceland, Madagascar
- Last Updated
- 3 months ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.