Delete
It tracks ur info and puts it on dark web
Description
The Performance Stat Index (PSI) was first introduced in 2009 in the form of a workbook for players on the ATP Challenger circuit to make them aware of strengths and weaknesses as well as get an overall view of their performance. Two more indexes were later added to the PSI for players in the intermediate and more advanced player range right below the highest level Index used on the ATP Challenger circuit.
Index 1: players with UTRs 3-6.99
Index 2: players with UTRs 7-10.99
Index 3: players with UTRs 11+
A statistical algorithm adds up the total RATIO DIFFERENCE of WON (Good Shots) to LOST (Bad Shots) points in a set. The algorithm then calculates to find the AVERAGE of points either won or lost PER GAME in the set. We refer to these average numbers of points as PSI Ratings.
Good Shots = Unreturned Serves, Winners, Forced Errors
Bad Shots = Double Faults, Unforced Errors, Missed Makeable Shots
After a set is played, both players receive PSI Ratings. If the player’s final PSI Ratings are positive, it means they won more points than lost. If the player’s final PSI Ratings are negative, it means they lost more points than won.
At the core of the app are the three indexes that ultimately bestow the PSI GRADES. Three areas of a player’s performance are graded within each designated Index; SERVICE PERFORMANCE, GROUNDSTROKE AND AUXILIARY, and OVERALL PERFORMANCE. All areas consist of uniformed parameters of Good Shot/Bad Shot point averages that make up each Index established through years of research of charting competitive matches at all levels of the game.
The following are the PSI PERFORMANCE GRADES.
Excellent Performance
Above Average Performance
Solid Performance
Below Average Performance
Poor Performance
Because the total number of shots recorded can fluctuate, ratios can vary from a 1 to 1.1 ratio to a 1 to 1.9 ratio and so on. A point of reference (midpoint) and closest to Index 2 OVERALL PERFORMANCE parameters is this example.
Excellent Performance
3 Good Shots to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Above Average Performance
2 Good Shots to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Solid Performance
1 Good Shot to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Below Average Performance
1 Good Shot to 2 Bad Shot Ratio
Poor Performance
1 Good Shot to 3 Bad Shot Ratio
Index 1 will have a lower threshold to Solid. Index 3 will have a higher threshold to Solid.
Terms of Use EULA: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
Hide
Show More...
Index 1: players with UTRs 3-6.99
Index 2: players with UTRs 7-10.99
Index 3: players with UTRs 11+
A statistical algorithm adds up the total RATIO DIFFERENCE of WON (Good Shots) to LOST (Bad Shots) points in a set. The algorithm then calculates to find the AVERAGE of points either won or lost PER GAME in the set. We refer to these average numbers of points as PSI Ratings.
Good Shots = Unreturned Serves, Winners, Forced Errors
Bad Shots = Double Faults, Unforced Errors, Missed Makeable Shots
After a set is played, both players receive PSI Ratings. If the player’s final PSI Ratings are positive, it means they won more points than lost. If the player’s final PSI Ratings are negative, it means they lost more points than won.
At the core of the app are the three indexes that ultimately bestow the PSI GRADES. Three areas of a player’s performance are graded within each designated Index; SERVICE PERFORMANCE, GROUNDSTROKE AND AUXILIARY, and OVERALL PERFORMANCE. All areas consist of uniformed parameters of Good Shot/Bad Shot point averages that make up each Index established through years of research of charting competitive matches at all levels of the game.
The following are the PSI PERFORMANCE GRADES.
Excellent Performance
Above Average Performance
Solid Performance
Below Average Performance
Poor Performance
Because the total number of shots recorded can fluctuate, ratios can vary from a 1 to 1.1 ratio to a 1 to 1.9 ratio and so on. A point of reference (midpoint) and closest to Index 2 OVERALL PERFORMANCE parameters is this example.
Excellent Performance
3 Good Shots to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Above Average Performance
2 Good Shots to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Solid Performance
1 Good Shot to 1 Bad Shot Ratio
Below Average Performance
1 Good Shot to 2 Bad Shot Ratio
Poor Performance
1 Good Shot to 3 Bad Shot Ratio
Index 1 will have a lower threshold to Solid. Index 3 will have a higher threshold to Solid.
Terms of Use EULA: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
In-Apps
- Couple
- 49.00 r
- Meitu ID Photo
- 49.00 r
- 美图AI写真
- 39.00 r
- Meitu- 5 Credits
- 29.00 r
- Meitu- 25 Credits
- 89.00 r
- Yearly Auto-renew VIP
- 299.00 r
- Monthly Auto-renew VIP
- 89.00 r
- Quarterly Auto-renew VIP
- 129.00 r
- More Discounts for AI photo
- 29.00 r
- Monthly Auto-renew Meitu VIP+
- 105.00 r
Screenshots
Texting App FAQ
-
Is Texting App free?
Yes, Texting App is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.
-
Is Texting App legit?
🤔 The Texting App app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.
Thanks for the vote -
How much does Texting App cost?
Texting App has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is 90.60 r.
-
What is Texting App revenue?
To get estimated revenue of Texting App app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
User Rating
4.72 out of 5
388 ratings in Norway
5 star
327
4 star
36
3 star
13
2 star
3
1 star
9
Ratings History
Texting App Reviews
🤩
Best app ever!! Almost no ads and very good quality⭐️And the earser tool works 10/10. This app have helped me out probably 100 times😁
Really good quality!
I love when the quality gets better!
I cant install the app
I’m not able to install the app
For mye reklamer!! Dårlig!!!
Kommer reklamer hele tida, dårlig!!!!
I really like this app :)
Easy to use, many features, filters, photoshop, video editing, and free! No extra payment! 10/10!
🥰😍
แอพนี้มันดีมากๆเลยค่ะ โครตของโครตๆดี😍
😍
One of my fav apps😍👌👌
great app, much fun
I use it to edit random things, HOURS OF ENTERTAINMENT, much good, very recommend.
I LOVE IT
So easy to use, and I love all the features!! 10/10 I always use this to edit photos and sometimes I use it just for fun
Store Rankings
Ranking History
Category Rankings
|
Chart
|
Category
|
Rank
|
|---|---|---|
|
Top Free
|
|
1
|
|
Top Free
|
|
1
|
|
Top Free
|
|
1
|
|
Top Free
|
|
1
|
|
Top Free
|
|
1
|
Keywords
Texting App Competitors
Meitu Installs
Last 30 days
Meitu Revenue
Last 30 daysTexting App Revenue and Downloads
Gain valuable insights into Meitu performance with our analytics.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
Sign up now to access downloads, revenue, and more.
App Info
- Category
- Photo Video
- Publisher
-
Xiamen Meitu Technology Co
- Languages
- English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, Spanish, Thai, Tibetan, Chinese, Turkish, Vietnamese
- Recent release
- 11.12.0 (3 days ago )
- Released on
- Feb 15, 2011 (14 years ago )
- Also available in
- China, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Hong Kong SAR China, United States, South Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Canada, Brazil, Indonesia, Australia, Russia, Mexico, United Kingdom, Türkiye, France, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, Germany, Spain, Italy, Ukraine, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Colombia, Netherlands, United Arab Emirates, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Pakistan, Ecuador, Sweden, Switzerland, Poland, South Africa, Israel, Portugal, Belgium, Belarus, Dominican Republic, Azerbaijan, Ireland, Norway, Armenia, Austria, Romania, Kuwait, Denmark, Nigeria, Nepal, Finland, Hungary, Uzbekistan, Algeria, Greece, Czechia, Tunisia, Bahrain, Sri Lanka, Lebanon, Bulgaria, Croatia, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, Estonia, North Macedonia, Brunei, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Malta, Iceland, Madagascar
- Last Updated
- 2 days ago
This page includes copyrighted content from third parties, shared solely for commentary and research in accordance with fair use under applicable copyright laws. All trademarks, including product, service, and company names or logos, remain the property of their respective owners. Their use here falls under nominative fair use as outlined by trademark laws and does not suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by the trademark holders.