Overall good with some bugs
I am very satisfied with the key functionalities but there are some annoying bug (look up, dictionary function is not working) that is causing serious trouble to non English speakers ..
Yes, The Economist is free to download, however it contains in-app purchases or subscription offerings.
🤔 The The Economist app's quality is mixed. Some users are satisfied, while others report issues. Consider reading individual reviews for more context.
The Economist has several in-app purchases/subscriptions, the average in-app price is €132.13.
To get estimated revenue of The Economist app and other AppStore insights you can sign up to AppTail Mobile Analytics Platform.
4.8 out of 5
1,172 ratings in Greece
I am very satisfied with the key functionalities but there are some annoying bug (look up, dictionary function is not working) that is causing serious trouble to non English speakers ..
Love the content Love the app Keep up the great work
Selected topics are discussed in depth providing an understanding of the prevailing world issues.
Credible and impartial reporting Insightful commentaries Keep it up!!
It’s a shame that subscribers are treated the same as one off readers. Ads make the experience much worse
Great, precise and fun design. At last a news app that is actually handy! The content is always exceptional and very much objectified. Most often reliable!
So frustrated with all the feature regressions in the new app.
The magazine is wonderful. The app used to be too. But the new version doesn’t allow you to read an issue linearly - it prompts you to jump around. Downloaded content disappears making offline access problematic. And it’s hard to know which articles you’ve read. Please go back to the old version.
The Economist doesn’t need my endorsement of the quality of their journalism. It speaks for itself. Rather, I’ll comment that their app is wellAdesigned and refreshing to use. Their developers have made large leaps in the past several years to make the interface less buggy and more focused. I love being able to easily download entire editions, listen to articles with real narrators, and search for past articles. I have no complaints. Some uses complain of the ads, but I’d encourage you to hold your criticism. Media companies cannot survive on subscription fees alone—that’s been largely true since their inception. I suppose that makes me an ad-apologist, but if these ads enable the high-quality journalism we all love, then I feel we should grin and bear the ads. And for what it’s worth, I’ve never found the ads to be particularly distracting.
First it has no memory: I am unable to resume reading from where I left: when I switch or walk away from an article and come back, it resets to main window. Yes I remember what I was reading earlier today but it is annoying to refind from main window. This app is supposed to be the reader of the newspaper. Second, the audio option has many bugs: e.g: you can’t even see the queue. You say “clear the queue” but it does not. When you build audio queue the sequence from the newspaper is not followed (US section should not begin with Lexington column). I did stick with the Legacy app-was much better- and the Apple Podcast option (no longer available). It sounds like this app developer never finished the project since at least 3 years…
|
Chart
|
Category
|
Rank
|
|---|---|---|
|
Top Grossing
|
|
1
|
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|
|
Top Grossing
|
|
2
|